Author Topic: Hate Suvs? I Do To..  (Read 2191 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kirin

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 2957
  • Karma: -2
Hate Suvs? I Do To..
« on: May 19, 2005, 08:44:03 AM »
Saw this article and thought some of you might like to see it.
My personal grievience of suvs is that hardly any of them truly go off road and that I can't see a damn thing around them in my small car's.




Friday, January 7, 2005 (SF Gate)
Do SUVs Make You Stupid?/Pointless, dangerous and vain as ever, land tanks
still sell millions. Only one explanation possible
By Mark Morford, SF Gate Columnist

Maybe stupid is too strong a word.

Maybe it's more like willful ignorance. More like intentional blindness.
More like a calm and conscious denial in the face of a staggering stack of
overwhelming facts that if you looked at for even one minute would prove
that land tanks are some of the most overrated and silly and harmful and
utterly pointless vehicles on the planet.

OK, maybe stupid is the right word.

Because there really is no other explanation for the still-roaring
success
of the land tank. Still no other explanation for their bizarre popularity,
for the fact that, according to the Census Bureau and despite California's
legendary rep for organics and environmentalism and concerns of health and
body and air, our fine and heavily Schwarzeneggered state leads the nation
in new registrations for SUVs.

Sad but true. Registrations for the huge lumps of bulbous steel jumped 39
percent between 1997 and 2002, from 1.9 million to 2.75 million, and
overall there's been a whopping 56 percent jump in sales of the beasts in
a mere eight years across the country, totaling nearly 25 million of the
ugly tanks now lumbering across the American landscape and hogging all the
parking and burning up most of the oil and sneering in the face of air
quality and all rational thought and flipping over and bursting into flame
after hitting a pinecone at 80 mph.

You can see it in the eyes of most every new SUV buyer as they stare,
wide
eyed and overwhelmed, at the massive vehicles in the showroom: some sort
of veil drops over their eyes, some sort of weird opiate pumps into their
brains and they lose all sense of reason or common sense or environmental
concern and their ego balloons and their testosterone kicks up three
notches and they go into some sort of spasm of denial about how purchasing
one of these things will, in fact, contribute quite heartily to the
overall ill health of their own bodies and the planet as a whole, not to
mention the very reason we are so desperately, violently at war.

And the salesman sees that look and just smiles and licks his chops and
points out how this 4-ton hunk of environmental devastation can seat nine
and tow a large tractor or maybe 15 head of cattle, plus it has 27 cup
holders and three DVD players and a built-in sense of false superiority,
and the vaguely depressed regularly emasculated suburban dad or the
gum-snapping Marina girl with way too much of her parents' money and way
too little self-defined taste takes one look and goes, oooh.

What, too harsh? Not really. Most people know these facts to be true, but
buy the tanks anyway in a mad collusion of wishful thinking and raw denial
and false advertising, absolutely convinced the beasts are somehow safer
and sturdier (they're neither) and that they absolutely must have 37 cubic
feet of cargo space to haul their grocery bags and 4-wheel-drive traction
to get over those little concrete barriers in the mall parking lot and
just ignore the fact that the thing rides like a brick and handles like a
block of lead and is about as attractive and beautifully designed as a jar
of rocks.

Irony? The SUV drips with it. Fact is, most Americans consider themselves
environmentally conscious and claim to care deeply about protecting
natural resources and don't really want war and suffering or the insane
BushCo-brand oil dependence that causes both.

But the truth is, if Americans really cared about energy and pollution
and
reducing reliance on foreign oil and getting us out from under the massive
hypocritical terrorist-supportin' Saudi thumb, they'd buy smaller or more
efficient vehicles. Period. But they don't.

Waiting for that hybrid SUV to make it all better? Good for you. Step in
the right direction, truly, though of course improved gas mileage and
reduced emissions do nothing to allay the fact that SUVs still roll and
still can't maneuver to avoid accidents and still hog parking and still
assault the eye and tread as lightly on the planet as Arnold
Schwarzenegger in ski boots. But hey. It's a start.

Another big fallacy? SUV roominess. Hell, ugly ol' minivans have far more
storage and headroom, as do most sport wagons, PT Cruisers -- even large
hatchbacks have more than enough overall storage (and often better
headroom) for any but the largest of families and oh my God even this is a
moot point because you well know that 97 percent of all SUVs on the road
are single occupant and the only \"cargo\" is their purse or their gym bag,
while the other 36 square feet is taken up by, well, ego and attitude and
air.

Machismo? Well, yes. There's that. Big feeling of invincibility in an
SUV,
of a high and mighty driving position that gives you that commanding
sensation, so strong and so powerful that you are willing to overlook that
it's just an illusion, deceptive and harmful given how SUVs actually have
more accidents, actually cause more accidents than passenger cars because
they can't maneuver in emergency situations and can't stop in rain or snow
and tend to flip over easier than Paris Hilton after a dozen Bacardi
shooters.

And then you hear that, according to the U.S. National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, minivans are 10 times safer than SUVs in a crash.
Whoops.

Truth is, small, nimble passenger cars may not survive a head-on
collision
with a Freightliner quite as well as your bigass Navigator, dude, but they
do a hell of a lot better avoiding it in the first place. Which is why
rates of serious accidents and incidents of death are actually lower for
smaller cars than almost any lurching monster truck on the road. Period.

And sure you can be cheered slightly at the news that SUV sales are
slightly sluggish lately, down 2 percent, and that Hummer sales are way
off and Prius sales are way up and there's still a three-month waiting
list for Mini Coopers.

Until you realize that 2 percent ain't much of nuthin' and until you read
how the U.S. consumes 20 million barrels of oil each day, with passenger
vehicles burning up three quarters of the total -- and SUVs alone burn
half the total for all passenger cars, far more than their fair share and
more petroleum than our entire country produces in a year.

And then you learn how that little pip-squeak tyrant Saddam was sitting
on
10 percent of the world's oil reserves and that he might have once thought
about threatening the nearby 60 percent owned by our buddies the
terrorist-lovin', women-slappin' Saudis, and you realize that anyone who
thinks we're in Iraq for democracy or humanity's sake is absolutely full
of Rumsfeld.

Look. I know many people who own SUVs. Good people. Lovely people.
Friends. Family. I know their arguments for owning them. I know that they
know, deep down, that most of those arguments hold little sway and most
are rather hollow and the result of slick marketing and just a little bit
of fear.

And I know there is no accounting for taste and that a big part of the
sad
American ideology is a willful separation of cause and effect, a general
ignorance of how our choices affect the world, and that there are worse
atrocities in the world than owning a shiny black knobby-tired 5-ton Ford
Expedition that never sees anything more rugged than a pothole in the
Krispy Kreme drive-thru.

But, really, we have to just admit it: the SUV is hypocrisy incarnate. It
is the perfect emblem for the American view, for our position in the
world: gluttonous, vain, dangerous to almost everyone else on the road,
mostly useless (over 85 percent of SUVs never see a dirt road, much less
need 4-wheel drive), ugly as hell and as graceful or practical as a school
bus on an ice-skating rink.

Just admit it. Maybe it will help. Maybe a tiny confession of guilt will
put us back on the right track. After all, admission of the problem is the
first step toward recovery, right? That, and placing your order now for
the badass new VW GTI.

Thoughts for the author? E-mail him.

Mark's column archives are here

Mark Morford's Notes & Errata column appears every Wednesday and Friday
on
SF Gate, unless it appears on Tuesdays and Thursdays, which it never does.
Subscribe to this column at
sfgate.com/newsletters. ----------------------------------------------------
------------------
Copyright 2005 SF Gate.
 
If more power is better. Then too much is just enough.
Why do it once when you can do it thrice?

Offline HeliMike

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1158
  • Karma: 0
Hate Suvs? I Do To..
« Reply #1 on: May 19, 2005, 09:51:53 AM »
:rockon:
That truly was one of the best-written (if no the best) articles I have ever read.
I have always asked myself \"if we're running out of oil how does the big three still get away with producing these oversized, gas-guzzling, absolutey useless street-terrorists\"? Especially GM and all of it's spin-offs which bases almost their whole platform on large and semi-large SUV's.
I think anyone that owns these mammoth beasts should be held accountable for it at the pump and at the insurance company.
Luxury tax, gas-guzzler tax, enviro-levy's, and \"look at me, I'm a drug-dealer\" tax. :rolleyes:  Okay maybe the last one only applies to people in Langley. B)
 
67 Sunroof Beetle


Offline moni

  • *
  • Posts: 781
  • Karma: 25
    • http://www.texturedimpressions.com
Hate Suvs? I Do To..
« Reply #2 on: May 19, 2005, 12:58:29 PM »
a while back i read an article (I think it was from the NY Times) that statistically proved that SUV owners were the biggest jerks on the road. the hilarious part was none of it was anecdotal; it was all based on academic research regarding the personality types of certain income brackets and the demographics of people purchasing SUVs from all producers. while a lot of it seemed commonsense, it still cracked me up that people would spend time statistically proving it to be true...
Sometimes I get the feeling the whole world is against me, but deep down I know that's not true. Some smaller countries are neutral.


Offline Cameron

  • *
  • Posts: 525
  • Karma: 1
Hate Suvs? I Do To..
« Reply #3 on: May 19, 2005, 04:13:46 PM »
I have girl friends who say that a guy is over compensating for something. Big SUV = small dick.
I smile and tell them I have a beetle at home.

California was thinking about banning heavy SUV's from residential streets for a while.
Article from The Slate HERE.


It's an insane world out there... and I'm proud to be part of it!

  

Offline Scratchy

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 209
  • Karma: 0
    • http://scratchy.kicks-ass.net
Hate Suvs? I Do To..
« Reply #4 on: May 19, 2005, 05:23:06 PM »
Actually one of the better ideas coming out of TransLink was to have the Insurance cost of your Vehicle tied into the fuel cost.
The more you drive, the more Insurance you pay. The bigger the boat you drive, the more Insurance you pay to drive it!

They should add one for Arrogance factor too -  ]:(  

 -= Remember, even at a Mensa convention someone is the dumbest person in the room! =-

Offline Chris

  • Posts: 6118
  • Karma: -125
  • Car.
Hate Suvs? I Do To..
« Reply #5 on: May 19, 2005, 05:45:09 PM »
its already tied to the weight by the road tax you pay, If you dont need a big truck why the hell do you have it?  

Offline dannyboy

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1082
  • Karma: 1
Hate Suvs? I Do To..
« Reply #6 on: May 19, 2005, 05:54:12 PM »
Quote
Actually one of the better ideas coming out of TransLink was to have the Insurance cost of your Vehicle tied into the fuel cost.
The more you drive, the more Insurance you pay. The bigger the boat you drive, the more Insurance you pay to drive it!

They should add one for Arrogance factor too - angry.gif
but what happens to the people that commute long distances....  even in a small car it costs $$$
« Last Edit: May 19, 2005, 05:54:32 PM by dannyboy »

Offline AirCooledRules

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 695
  • Karma: -12
Hate Suvs? I Do To..
« Reply #7 on: May 19, 2005, 06:52:09 PM »
i dont think he means how much gas you burn in a given period of time.

he means how many liters the vehicle burns for example per 100km.
1960 Volkswagen Beetle

1975 Honda CB125S
1983 Audi UR-Quattro
1984 Volkswagen Rabbit GTI
1998 Audi A6

Offline ehos

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 257
  • Karma: 0
Hate Suvs? I Do To..
« Reply #8 on: May 19, 2005, 09:36:03 PM »
Vehicles should have a speed limit based on their weight.  It makes sense as F=ma

The fatter your car, the slower you can go (and not just 'legally' it should be speed governed, checked, regulated).  So if your SUV weighs twice as much as my bug, then you can only go half as fast.  (Force of the collision will be the same according to physics).

 

Offline Chris

  • Posts: 6118
  • Karma: -125
  • Car.
Hate Suvs? I Do To..
« Reply #9 on: May 19, 2005, 10:02:46 PM »
I think we should just give up, what the hell makes them a sport utility vehicle anyway? there not sporty, there useless, and pretty poor choice of a vehicle. Its like the original ford explorer, the company I worked for when they came out leased 3 of them, everytime we engaged the 4 wheel drive it cost $3000 in repairs......

I think they should make them eligible for the crappy vehicle gets you a bicycle plan.  

Offline Hansk

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1638
  • Karma: 4
Hate Suvs? I Do To..
« Reply #10 on: May 19, 2005, 10:45:49 PM »
Quote
If you dont need a big truck why the hell do you have it?
Exactly , see but thats the thing. They are not trucks . And they are not cars. They don't do either task well . I don't think they would take you off road well either . And for this you pay much more to buy too. :wacko:  
Big fat black fastback

Offline silas

  • *
  • Posts: 6825
  • Karma: 20
    • Some cool videos...Check them out!!
Hate Suvs? I Do To..
« Reply #11 on: May 19, 2005, 11:13:12 PM »
yes but, if there were no SUV's, what would all the soccer milfs drive?

Offline Chris

  • Posts: 6118
  • Karma: -125
  • Car.
Hate Suvs? I Do To..
« Reply #12 on: May 19, 2005, 11:14:46 PM »
m-vans like the dvkk!

Offline moni

  • *
  • Posts: 781
  • Karma: 25
    • http://www.texturedimpressions.com
Hate Suvs? I Do To..
« Reply #13 on: May 20, 2005, 12:03:38 AM »
Quote
I have girl friends who say that a guy is over compensating for something. Big SUV = small dick.
I smile and tell them I have a beetle at home.
lmao!!  i've heard that one too, but never that response.  :rockon:  
Sometimes I get the feeling the whole world is against me, but deep down I know that's not true. Some smaller countries are neutral.


Offline kirin

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 2957
  • Karma: -2
Hate Suvs? I Do To..
« Reply #14 on: May 20, 2005, 01:26:52 AM »
Hey,
If any of you volks are more interested in the whole oil debate and a bit more about SUVs and how the big three get away with it. Pick up \"its the crude dude\" by Linda Mcquaig. Really good and it talks abit about how in the 60's the US government taxed Volkswagen for bringing in pickups.
So if your a poli-sci dork like me look into it. Also has some stuff on Dubya and his cronies
If more power is better. Then too much is just enough.
Why do it once when you can do it thrice?

Offline Mike Scott

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 727
  • Karma: 0
Hate Suvs? I Do To..
« Reply #15 on: May 20, 2005, 08:31:37 AM »
Quote
Vehicles should have a speed limit based on their weight.  It makes sense as F=ma

The fatter your car, the slower you can go (and not just 'legally' it should be speed governed, checked, regulated).  So if your SUV weighs twice as much as my bug, then you can only go half as fast.  (Force of the collision will be the same according to physics).
Because cars all going different speeds on the highway is a good idea?

Offline dannyboy

  • Full Member
  • Posts: 1082
  • Karma: 1
Hate Suvs? I Do To..
« Reply #16 on: May 20, 2005, 09:52:52 AM »
Quote
QUOTE (ehos @ May 19 2005, 08:36 PM)
Vehicles should have a speed limit based on their weight. It makes sense as F=ma

The fatter your car, the slower you can go (and not just 'legally' it should be speed governed, checked, regulated). So if your SUV weighs twice as much as my bug, then you can only go half as fast. (Force of the collision will be the same according to physics).

Because cars all going different speeds on the highway is a good idea?
and how exactly do you plan toregulate that?